Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2] ASoC: wm8994: Manage wm8994's MCLK in codec driver

[Charles Keepax]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 07:46:21PM +0900, Inha Song wrote:
> Previously, When we use wm8994 codec, we should control its MCLK in machine driver.
> But, It should be managed by wm8994 codec driver, not machine driver.
> 
> This patch add MCLK clock DT parsing logic and control own MCLK.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Inha Song <ideal.song@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c
> index 4fbc768..acb6b44 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/pm.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/gcd.h>
>  #include <linux/i2c.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -2471,6 +2472,7 @@ static int wm8994_set_bias_level(struct snd_soc_codec *codec,
>  {
>  	struct wm8994_priv *wm8994 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
>  	struct wm8994 *control = wm8994->wm8994;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	wm_hubs_set_bias_level(codec, level);
>  
> @@ -2492,8 +2494,15 @@ static int wm8994_set_bias_level(struct snd_soc_codec *codec,
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (codec->dapm.bias_level == SND_SOC_BIAS_STANDBY)
> +		if (codec->dapm.bias_level == SND_SOC_BIAS_STANDBY) {
> +			for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wm8994->clk_mclk); i++)
> +				clk_prepare_enable(wm8994->clk_mclk[i]);

This still looks like you need some response to Mark's comments.

> +
>  			active_reference(codec);
> +		} else if (codec->dapm.bias_level == SND_SOC_BIAS_ON) {
> +			for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wm8994->clk_mclk); i++)
> +				clk_disable_unprepare(wm8994->clk_mclk[i]);
> +		}
>  		break;
>  
>  	case SND_SOC_BIAS_STANDBY:
> @@ -4449,6 +4458,7 @@ static struct snd_soc_codec_driver soc_codec_dev_wm8994 = {
>  static int wm8994_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct wm8994_priv *wm8994;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	wm8994 = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct wm8994_priv),
>  			      GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -4460,6 +4470,16 @@ static int wm8994_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	wm8994->wm8994 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
>  
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wm8994->clk_mclk); i++) {
> +		char mclk_name[] = "MCLKx";
> +
> +		snprintf(mclk_name, sizeof(mclk_name), "MCLK%d", i + 1);
> +
> +		wm8994->clk_mclk[i] = devm_clk_get(pdev->dev.parent, mclk_name);
> +		if (IS_ERR(wm8994->clk_mclk[i]))
> +			wm8994->clk_mclk[i] = NULL;

This still looks wrong, devm_clk_get will return an -ENOENT if it
can't find a clock, but any other error is surely an actual error
that we should fail on?

Thanks,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/