Re: [PATCH] pidff driver should work correctly with more than one concurrent effect

[Jiri Kosina]

On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Jim Keir wrote:

> The PID driver (usbhid/hid-pidff.c) does not set the effect ID when
> uploading an effect. The result is that the initial upload works but
> subsequent uploads to modify effect parameters are all directed at the
> last-created effect.
> 
> The targeted effect ID must be passed back to the device when effect
> parameters are changed. This is done at the start of
> "pidff_set_condition_report", "pidff_set_periodic_report" etc. based on
> the value of "pidff->block_load[PID_EFFECT_
> BLOCK_INDEX].value[0]".
> 
> This value is only ever set during pidff_request_effect_upload.
> The result is stored in "pidff->pid_id[effect->id]" at the end of
> pid_upload_effect, for later use. However, if an effect is modified and
> re-sent then this identifier is not being copied back from
> pidff->pid_id[effect->id] before sending the command to the device. The
> fix is to do this at the start of pidff_upload_effect.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jim Keir <jimkeir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to for-4.1/upstream.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/