Re: [PATCH v2] ring-buffer: Replace this_cpu_*() with __this_cpu_*()

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Guten Morgen Steven,

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:40:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>  static __always_inline void trace_recursive_unlock(void)
>  {
> -	unsigned int val = this_cpu_read(current_context);
> +	unsigned int val = __this_cpu_read(current_context);
> +	unsigned int val2;
>  
> -	val--;
> -	val &= this_cpu_read(current_context);
> -	this_cpu_write(current_context, val);
> +	val2 = val - 1;
> +	val &= val2;
> +	__this_cpu_write(current_context, val);
You could use:

	unsigned int val = __this_cpu_read(current_context);

	val = val & (val - 1);

	__this_cpu_write(current_context, val);

and save a few lines and still make it more readable (IMHO).

BTW, this patch makes the additional lines in the trace disappear, so if
you think that makes a Tested-by applicable, feel free to add it.

Best regards
Uwe
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/