Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 01/22] smpboot: Add common code for notification from dying CPU

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Mar 17 2015 - 12:56:46 EST


On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 03:08:46PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 04:36:48AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 09:18:07AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:37:45AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > RCU ignores offlined CPUs, so they cannot safely run RCU read-side code.
> > > > (They -can- use SRCU, but not RCU.) This means that any use of RCU
> > > > during or after the call to arch_cpu_idle_dead(). Unfortunately,
> > > > commit 2ed53c0d6cc99 added a complete() call, which will contain RCU
> > > > read-side critical sections if there is a task waiting to be awakened.
> > >
> > > Got a little more detail there?
> >
> > Quite possibly. But exactly what sort of detail are you looking for?
>
> What exact RCU usage you ran into that was problematic. It seems to
> imply that calling complete() -- from a dead cpu -- which ends up in
> try_to_wake_up() was the problem?

Hmm, I'm thinking its select_task_rq_*(). And yes, 'fixing' this in the
wake-up path will penalize everybody for the benefit of the very rare
case someone is doing a hotplug.

So yeah, maybe this is the best solution.. Ulgy though :/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/