Re: [PATCH] fs/pstore: Optimization function ramoops_init_przs

[Kees Cook]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Wang Long <long.wanglong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The value of cxt->record_size does not change in the loop,
> so this patch optimize the assign statement by moving
> it to outer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/pstore/ram.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> index 44a549b..2105a16 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> @@ -373,6 +373,7 @@ static int ramoops_init_przs(struct device *dev, struct ramoops_context *cxt,
>  {
>         int err = -ENOMEM;
>         int i;
> +       size_t sz;
>
>         if (!cxt->record_size)
>                 return 0;
> @@ -393,9 +394,8 @@ static int ramoops_init_przs(struct device *dev, struct ramoops_context *cxt,
>                 goto fail_prz;
>         }
>
> +       sz = cxt->record_size;
>         for (i = 0; i < cxt->max_dump_cnt; i++) {
> -               size_t sz = cxt->record_size;
> -
>                 cxt->przs[i] = persistent_ram_new(*paddr, sz, 0,
>                                                   &cxt->ecc_info,
>                                                   cxt->memtype);
> --
> 1.8.3.4
>

Actually, can't we drop sz entirely and just use cxt->record_size in its place?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/