Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: move lock/unlock_as_irq calls into request/release resources methods

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le 09/03/2015 17:14, Linus Walleij a Ãcrit :
>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Boris Brezillon
>> <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> The gpiochip_lock_as_irq call can fail and return an error, while the
>>> irq_startup is not expected to fail (returns an unsigned int which is not
>>> checked by irq core code).
>>>
>>> irq_request/release_resources functions have been created to address this
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> Move gpiochip_lock/unlock_as_irq calls into
>>> irq_request/release_resources functions to prevent using a gpio as an irq
>>> if the gpiochip_lock_as_irq call failed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Patch applied with all the ACKs.
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> As suggested earlier, do you think it can be scheduled for the 4.0-rc
> phase as a "fix"?

OK argh had to rebase my tree to get the patch out of the devel
branch but what can I do.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/