Re: [PATCHv3 xfstests 2/3] generic: test openat and new O_BENEATH flag

[Dave Chinner]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 08:33:27AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Dave Chinner
> <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 02:00:11PM +0000, David Drysdale wrote:
> >> Test basic openat(2) behaviour.
> >>
> >> Test that if O_BENEATH flag is set, openat() will only open
> >> paths that have no .. component and do not start with /.
> >> Symlinks are also checked for the same restrictions.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Drysdale <drysdale@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
> >> .gitignore            |   1 + common/openat         |  61
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/Makefile          |   3 +-
> >> src/openat.c          | 100
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > This strikes me as something that shoul dbe added to xfs_io for
> > testing, as it already supports a heap of other open flags and
> > xfstests is already dependent on it.
> 
> While I don't see a problem adding this to xfs_io, I'd still like
> to see this test live in the kernel tree too.

You can do whatever you want with the kernel tree - it doesn't
concern me at all.

> Having it in the
> same source means more testing, IMO.

That's complete bunk, though.  This helper binary is a limited use,
one shot test that can't be combined with anything else.  "sharing"
the source code across multiple different test suites doesn't change
that. However, putting support into xfs_io means it will get more
testing because we can *easily* use the functionality in many, many
different ways.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/