Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: protect suid binaries against rowhammer with copy-on-read mappings

From: Konstantin Khlebnikov
Date: Wed Mar 18 2015 - 11:08:17 EST


On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 01:30 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>> + /*
>> + * Read-only SUID/SGID binares are mapped as copy-on-read
>> + * this protects them against exploiting with Rowhammer.
>> + */
>> + if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) &&
>> + ((inode->i_mode & S_ISUID) || ((inode->i_mode & S_ISGID) &&
>> + (inode->i_mode & S_IXGRP)))) {
>> + vm_flags &= ~(VM_SHARED | VM_MAYSHARE);
>> + vm_flags |= VM_COR;
>> + }
>
> I think we probably need to come to _some_ sort of understanding in the
> kernel of how much we are willing to do to thwart these kinds of
> attacks. I suspect it's a very deep rabbit hole.
>
> For this particular case, I don't see how this would be effective. The
> existing exploit which you reference attacks PTE pages which are
> unmapped in to the user address space. I'm confused how avoiding
> mapping a page in to an attacker's process can keep it from being exploited.
>
> Right now, there's a relatively small number of pages that will get
> COW'd for a SUID binary. This greatly increases the number which could
> allow spraying of these (valuable) copy-on-read pages.

Yeah, on second thought that copy-on-read gives the same security
level as hiding pfns from userspace. Sorry for the noise.

It seems the only option is memory zoning: kernel should allocate all
normal memory for userspace from isolated area which is kept far far
away from important data.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/