Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86_64,signal: Fix SS handling for signals delivered to 64-bit programs

[Andrey Wagin]

2015-03-18 21:50 GMT+03:00 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 07:31:33PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 03/18, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:48:43PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Shot in a dark afer a quick grep: restore_gpregs() should initialize ->ss?
>> >
>> > It hasn't been needed earlier, if this would help it means abi is broken, no? :)
>> > Otherwise I don't understand what's happening.
>>
>> until this commit the kernel simply forgot to restore ->ss in sigreturn().
>>
>> after this commit, if your rt_sigframe has garbage in ->ss then SIGSEGV
>> is clear.
>
> OK, so setting up a proper ss here should fix problem.
>
>> > >
>> > > Seriously, where is UserX86RegsEntry?
>> >
>> > It's in protobif/core-x86.proto, welcome to protobuf hell.
>>
>> Still can't find UserX86RegsEntry... OK, perhaps it comes from
>> user_x86_regs_entry in protobuf/core-x86.proto. Then I guess the patch I sent
>> can be compiled at least ;)
>
> Yeah, protobuf-c mangles "_" in message name so user_x86_regs_entry -> UserX86RegsEntry.
> Andrew should be able to test it tomorrow (hopefully it's no urgent right? ;)

This patch fixes the problem. Oleg, could you send this path in the
criu maillist?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/