On 03/18/2015 01:24 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
This patchset attempts to standarize the naming of dt-bindings
documents based on the Broadcom vendor prefix of brcm.
Although there are no guidelines currently present for how to name
the dt-bindings document the "vendor,binding.txt" style is in use by
some of the other vendors.
Conceptually I'm fine with this.
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The only comment I have is that some bindings refer to other bindings,
e.g. an I2C controller binding might refer to the core I2C binding to
define core I2C properties. Since this patch moves a couple files
between directories, did you double-check that none of the pathnames in
those references need fixing up?