Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: brcm: rationalize Broadcom documentation naming

[Scott Branden]

On 15-03-18 03:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 03:53 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On 15-03-18 12:42 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > On 03/18/2015 01:24 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
> > > > This patchset attempts to standarize the naming of dt-bindings
> > > > documents based on the Broadcom vendor prefix of brcm.
> > > >
> > > > Although there are no guidelines currently present for how to name
> > > > the dt-bindings document the "vendor,binding.txt" style is in use by
> > > > some of the other vendors.
> > >
> > > Conceptually I'm fine with this.
> > > Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > The only comment I have is that some bindings refer to other bindings,
> > > e.g. an I2C controller binding might refer to the core I2C binding to
> > > define core I2C properties. Since this patch moves a couple files
> > > between directories, did you double-check that none of the pathnames in
> > > those references need fixing up?
> >
> > Yes, I read all the brcm documents and did not find references to the
> > moved files.
>
> Oh, I meant references *from* the moved files to other files.
Yes, some of the moved/renamed files reference other files.  But those 
are to references to common dt-binding documentation files and of the 
form Documentation/devicetree/bindings/xxx/yyy.txt

> BTW, I just noticed that both your patches don't have signed-off-by lines.
Whoops - thanks - will have to correct.  Plus, add your Acked-by.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/