Re: [PATCH] trace, RAS: remove unnecessary const

[Borislav Petkov]

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 08:57:56AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> That's a bit of a stretch. But sure, there's no real downside to having
> it, except that it makes one take a double take when seeing it, and
> thinking about why it would even be needed (like I did).

Why? It simply declares the contract that this argument won't be
changed. And if there's no downside, there's no need to do anything
here.

> I think you had the crazy fantasy with the above patch!

Wasn't me.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/