Re: [PATCH RT 2/4] Revert "timers: do not raise softirq unconditionally"

[Steven Rostedt]

On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:17:09 +0100
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> (aw crap, let's go shopping)... so why is the one in timer.c ok?

It's not. Sebastian, you said there were no other cases of rt_mutexes
being taken in hard irq context. Looks like timer.c has one.

So perhaps the real fix is to get that special case of ownership in
hard interrupt context?

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/