Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes

[Sebastian Hesselbarth]

On 19.03.2015 17:02, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Perhaps better would be to have a mux-specific function to iterate over a
> > mux's child nodes and instantiate buses for those. That function would check
> > whether each bus node was disabled or not. That'd isolate the special case
> > into the place where it was relevant.
>
> ... so I wonder what you think about putting the
> of_device_is_available() check into i2c_add_mux_adapter() once the
> reg-property and chan_id have been matched?

Ok, I see what you mean. I had a look at the place in question and
wonder what to return from i2c_add_mux_adapter() in the disabled
case so that i2c-mux-pinctrl is still happy with the returned value.

I guess what you want to have is that i2c_add_adapter() is not called
for the disabled case, right?

Is the i2c_adapter struct prepared in i2c_mux_add_adapter() still valid
if i2c_add_adapter() is not called?

Sorry, I am not too deep into i2c subsystem, I just reworked i2c-mux-
pinctrl to make it work on Dove. If you are fine with giving me some
guidance how you prefer to have it done, I can try to free some spare
time. Unfortunately there is already little of it, so please don't
expect a quick tested patch.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/