Re: [PATCH] kselftest/timers: Set default threadtest values to simplify execution scripts
From: John Stultz
Date: Thu Mar 19 2015 - 18:34:32 EST
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 09:51 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>> In order to keep the kselftest Makefiles simpler, set the threadtest
>> default values to the ones used in standard run_tests
>>
>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/timers/threadtest.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Applied to next for 4.1
>
> Some numbers for you with timer tests included:
>
> make kselftest target takes:
>
> real 11m50.499s
> user 3m25.979s
> sys 5m45.433s
>
> It is creeping up, previous timing was
>
> real 9.41
> user 3.55
> system 0:24.86
>
> Not concerned yet. Might be getting closer to
> needing to defining quick vs long test categories.
Yea, the timekeeping tests are particularly rough about how long the
run. In some cases we're having to watch for behavior that could be
somewhat rare, so we need to watch for a fair amount of time. In some
cases we're doing our own calibrations which require a larger amount
of time to ensure accuracy. And in other cases, we want to have timers
that fire far enough out that any scheduler variance/noise is easy to
filter out.
With the destructive tests, which re-run the validation tests
repeatedly under different conditions, it ends up being about an hour!
So I feel this pain.
But there's also probably some spots where 3 seconds seemed like a
good value, but could be shorter. So I'll have to take another look
to see if we could reasonably compress some of the intervals we use
down. There may also be some spots where we could parallelize the
tests across the various clockids.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/