Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: slave: rework the slave API

[Wolfram Sang]

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 09:17:51PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-KÃnig wrote:
> Hello Wolfram,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 01:42:01PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > After more discussion, brave users, and additional datasheet evaluation,
> > some API updates for the new I2C slave framework became imminent. The
> > slave events now get some easier to understand naming. Also, the event
> > handling has been simplified to only send one event per interrupt.
> what is an interrupt here? An event where the bus driver needs feedback
> from the backend?

More the other way around: when the bus driver needs to notify the
backend. I wasn't 100% sure about the word 'interrupt', but then decided
a HW slave support without interrupts would be so rare and adventurous
that it is okay to use the term :)

> Other than that the patch looks fine. Thanks for working on my feedback!
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-KÃnig <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,

   Wolfram

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature