Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

[Will Deacon]

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:09:33AM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote:
> > If you can get that in place, I'm not opposed to putting this into
> > linux-next ahead of the firmware summit in San Jose next week. Note that
> > this is not a commitment for 4.1, since I'm keen to see the outcomes of
> > next week before setting anything in stone.
> 
> OK, I will stick to this mailing list and respond as soon as I can.

This doesn't even build for me:


$ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-none-linux-gnu- allmodconfig
$ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-none-linux-gnu- Image

[...]

In file included from drivers/xen/acpi.c:33:0:
include/xen/acpi.h: In function âxen_acpi_sleep_registerâ:
include/xen/acpi.h:102:3: error: âacpi_suspend_lowlevelâ undeclared (first use in this function)
   acpi_suspend_lowlevel = xen_acpi_suspend_lowlevel;
   ^
include/xen/acpi.h:102:3: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/xen/acpi.c: In function âxen_acpi_notify_hypervisor_stateâ:
drivers/xen/acpi.c:61:2: error: implicit declaration of function âHYPERVISOR_dom0_opâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  HYPERVISOR_dom0_op(&op);
  ^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [drivers/xen/acpi.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [drivers/xen] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [drivers] Error 2


Am I missing some other patches?

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/