Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Add warning for harmful goto labels

[Richard Weinberger]

Am 21.03.2015 um 23:06 schrieb L. Alberto Giménez:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:40:46PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Huh? Since when?
> 
> There are a lot of cases where a too generic goto label for cleanup
> causes a bug or makes debugging harder.
> 
> Last time was this G+ post, by Dan Carpenter:
> 
> https://plus.google.com/106378716002406849458/posts/DfuAkt8szf2
> 
> 
>> rw@azrael:~/linux (for-v4.1/uml_misc $)> git grep -e "goto out;" | wc -l
>> 26667
>> rw@azrael:~/linux (for-v4.1/uml_misc $)> git grep -e "goto fail;" | wc -l
>> 3733
> 
> If something is already in the kernel code, does that mean that it's OK?
> I honestly don't think so, and I think that goto labels for cleanup exit
> paths should be a little more descriptive.

I disagree. out and exit are perfectly fine labels.

>> What is next? Variable name "i" considered harmful?
> 
> No one complained about that so far. I might add that to checkpatch.pl
> if needed.

I *really* *really* hope you're kidding.

>> Can we please stop this nonsense.
> 
> It's just a proposal for a warning. If it is really not needed, it won't
> be applied and life will go on :)

checkpatch.pl is already more than annoying. It used to be a nice tool but
it becomes more and more an harassment for guys who actually work on the kernel.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/