Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add virtio-input driver.

[Gerd Hoffmann]

On Mo, 2015-03-23 at 15:54 +0100, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 03:27:35PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >   Hi,
> > 
> > > > > > You are doing leXXX everywhere, that's VERSION_1 dependency.
> > > > > > virtio_cread will do byteswaps differently without VERSION_1.
> > > > > > Just don't go there.
> > 
> > > So to clarify, you dislike using __virtio32 in virtio input header?
> > 
> > Well, as I understand things __virtio32 implies byteorder depends on
> > whenever we are using VERSION_1 or not.  And non-transitional drivers
> > should not need it as everything is by definition little endian.
> > 
> > So, yes, your suggestion to just require VERSION_1 in the driver implies
> > in my eyes that there should be no reason to use __virtio32 instead of
> > __le32.
> > 
> > Or do I miss something here?
> > 
> > cheers,
> >   Gerd
> > 
> 
> You are right but then if you do require VERSION_1 then
> __virtio32 becomes identical to __le32.

Except that sparse doesn't know that and throws errors when I mix the
two.

> There's some runtime overhead as we check on each access,
> but it shouldn't matter here, right?

Correct, config space is used at initialization time only.

> I guess we could add virtio_cread_le - is this what
> you'd like?

I just want something that makes both you and sparse happy.  I don't
care much whenever that is adding virtio_cread_le() or using __virtio32
even though it'll effectively is __le32 due to VERSION_1 being required.

cheers,
  Gerd


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/