Re: [2/9] powerpc/hv24x7: Remove unnecessary parameter
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Date: Mon Mar 23 2015 - 18:19:28 EST
Michael Ellerman [mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
| On Tue, 2015-17-02 at 22:00:27 UTC, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| > Use pr_notice_ratelimited() to log error messages and remove
| > the 'success_expected' parameter.
|
| I don't understand how this is equivalent?
They are two unrelated changes that I should have separated.
|
| The current code uses success_expected to indicate that once it's done the
| request once and found that it works, it then expects the request to continue
| working, and if it doesn't then that is an error.
The current code is using success_expected to _not_ log an error if
that initial request fails. i.e we silently return -EIO here.
I think the 'success_expected' parameter is not really necessary.
We can simply log the message even for that initial request.
And we can log it a lower priority than KERN_ERR since the message
is mostly for developers rather than users who would use event names
(which encode/abstract the domain and offset values).
|
| Using pr_ratelimited() will do the opposite, ie. the first failure will print a
| message, but that may not really indicate an error, it may just be a badly
| configured request.
|
| Or at least that's how I understand it, please convince me I'm wrong :)
|
| cheers
| _______________________________________________
| Linuxppc-dev mailing list
| Linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/