[PATCH 3.10 04/55] sparc: perf: Make counting mode actually work

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Mar 24 2015 - 11:44:20 EST


3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: David Ahern <david.ahern@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit d51291cb8f32bfae6b331e1838651f3ddefa73a5 ]

Currently perf-stat (aka, counting mode) does not work:

$ perf stat ls
...
Performance counter stats for 'ls':

1.585665 task-clock (msec) # 0.580 CPUs utilized
24 context-switches # 0.015 M/sec
0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
86 page-faults # 0.054 M/sec
<not supported> cycles
<not supported> stalled-cycles-frontend
<not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
<not supported> instructions
<not supported> branches
<not supported> branch-misses

0.002735100 seconds time elapsed

The reason is that state is never reset (stays with PERF_HES_UPTODATE set).
Add a call to sparc_pmu_enable_event during the added_event handling.
Clean up the encoding since pmu_start calls sparc_pmu_enable_event which
does the same. Passing PERF_EF_RELOAD to sparc_pmu_start means the call
to sparc_perf_event_set_period can be removed as well.

With this patch:

$ perf stat ls
...
Performance counter stats for 'ls':

1.552890 task-clock (msec) # 0.552 CPUs utilized
24 context-switches # 0.015 M/sec
0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
86 page-faults # 0.055 M/sec
5,748,997 cycles # 3.702 GHz
<not supported> stalled-cycles-frontend:HG
<not supported> stalled-cycles-backend:HG
1,684,362 instructions:HG # 0.29 insns per cycle
295,133 branches:HG # 190.054 M/sec
28,007 branch-misses:HG # 9.49% of all branches

0.002815665 seconds time elapsed

Signed-off-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c | 11 +++--------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -960,6 +960,8 @@ out:
cpuc->pcr[0] |= cpuc->event[0]->hw.config_base;
}

+static void sparc_pmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags);
+
/* On this PMU each PIC has it's own PCR control register. */
static void calculate_multiple_pcrs(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
{
@@ -972,20 +974,13 @@ static void calculate_multiple_pcrs(stru
struct perf_event *cp = cpuc->event[i];
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &cp->hw;
int idx = hwc->idx;
- u64 enc;

if (cpuc->current_idx[i] != PIC_NO_INDEX)
continue;

- sparc_perf_event_set_period(cp, hwc, idx);
cpuc->current_idx[i] = idx;

- enc = perf_event_get_enc(cpuc->events[i]);
- cpuc->pcr[idx] &= ~mask_for_index(idx);
- if (hwc->state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)
- cpuc->pcr[idx] |= nop_for_index(idx);
- else
- cpuc->pcr[idx] |= event_encoding(enc, idx);
+ sparc_pmu_start(cp, PERF_EF_RELOAD);
}
out:
for (i = 0; i < cpuc->n_events; i++) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/