[PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 041/165] nilfs2: fix potential memory overrun on inode
From: Luis Henriques
Date: Wed Mar 25 2015 - 10:44:06 EST
3.16.7-ckt9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 957ed60b53b519064a54988c4e31e0087e47d091 upstream.
Each inode of nilfs2 stores a root node of a b-tree, and it turned out to
have a memory overrun issue:
Each b-tree node of nilfs2 stores a set of key-value pairs and the number
of them (in "bn_nchildren" member of nilfs_btree_node struct), as well as
a few other "bn_*" members.
Since the value of "bn_nchildren" is used for operations on the key-values
within the b-tree node, it can cause memory access overrun if a large
number is incorrectly set to "bn_nchildren".
For instance, nilfs_btree_node_lookup() function determines the range of
binary search with it, and too large "bn_nchildren" leads
nilfs_btree_node_get_key() in that function to overrun.
As for intermediate b-tree nodes, this is prevented by a sanity check
performed when each node is read from a drive, however, no sanity check
has been done for root nodes stored in inodes.
This patch fixes the issue by adding missing sanity check against b-tree
root nodes so that it's called when on-memory inodes are read from ifile,
inode metadata file.
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nilfs2/btree.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/btree.c b/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
index b2e3ff347620..ecdbae19a766 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
#include "alloc.h"
#include "dat.h"
+static void __nilfs_btree_init(struct nilfs_bmap *bmap);
+
static struct nilfs_btree_path *nilfs_btree_alloc_path(void)
{
struct nilfs_btree_path *path;
@@ -368,6 +370,34 @@ static int nilfs_btree_node_broken(const struct nilfs_btree_node *node,
return ret;
}
+/**
+ * nilfs_btree_root_broken - verify consistency of btree root node
+ * @node: btree root node to be examined
+ * @ino: inode number
+ *
+ * Return Value: If node is broken, 1 is returned. Otherwise, 0 is returned.
+ */
+static int nilfs_btree_root_broken(const struct nilfs_btree_node *node,
+ unsigned long ino)
+{
+ int level, flags, nchildren;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ level = nilfs_btree_node_get_level(node);
+ flags = nilfs_btree_node_get_flags(node);
+ nchildren = nilfs_btree_node_get_nchildren(node);
+
+ if (unlikely(level < NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_NODE_MIN ||
+ level > NILFS_BTREE_LEVEL_MAX ||
+ nchildren < 0 ||
+ nchildren > NILFS_BTREE_ROOT_NCHILDREN_MAX)) {
+ pr_crit("NILFS: bad btree root (inode number=%lu): level = %d, flags = 0x%x, nchildren = %d\n",
+ ino, level, flags, nchildren);
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
int nilfs_btree_broken_node_block(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
int ret;
@@ -1713,7 +1743,7 @@ nilfs_btree_commit_convert_and_insert(struct nilfs_bmap *btree,
/* convert and insert */
dat = NILFS_BMAP_USE_VBN(btree) ? nilfs_bmap_get_dat(btree) : NULL;
- nilfs_btree_init(btree);
+ __nilfs_btree_init(btree);
if (nreq != NULL) {
nilfs_bmap_commit_alloc_ptr(btree, dreq, dat);
nilfs_bmap_commit_alloc_ptr(btree, nreq, dat);
@@ -2294,12 +2324,23 @@ static const struct nilfs_bmap_operations nilfs_btree_ops_gc = {
.bop_gather_data = NULL,
};
-int nilfs_btree_init(struct nilfs_bmap *bmap)
+static void __nilfs_btree_init(struct nilfs_bmap *bmap)
{
bmap->b_ops = &nilfs_btree_ops;
bmap->b_nchildren_per_block =
NILFS_BTREE_NODE_NCHILDREN_MAX(nilfs_btree_node_size(bmap));
- return 0;
+}
+
+int nilfs_btree_init(struct nilfs_bmap *bmap)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ __nilfs_btree_init(bmap);
+
+ if (nilfs_btree_root_broken(nilfs_btree_get_root(bmap),
+ bmap->b_inode->i_ino))
+ ret = -EIO;
+ return ret;
}
void nilfs_btree_init_gc(struct nilfs_bmap *bmap)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/