Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/asm/entry/64: do not TRACE_IRQS fast SYSRET64 path

[Ingo Molnar]

* Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> SYSRET code path has a small irq-off block.
> On this code path, TRACE_IRQS_ON can't be called right before interrupts
> are enabled for real, we can't clobber registers there.
> So current code does it earlier, in a safe place.
> 
> But with this, TRACE_IRQS_OFF/ON frames just two fast instructions,
> which is ridiculous: now most of irq-off block is _outside_ of the framing.
> 
> Do the same thing that we do on SYSCALL entry: do not track this irq-off block,
> it is very small to ever cause noticeable irq latency.
> 
> Be careful: make sure that "jnz int_ret_from_sys_call_irqs_off" now does
> invoke TRACE_IRQS_OFF - move int_ret_from_sys_call_irqs_off label before
> TRACE_IRQS_OFF.

> @@ -345,8 +346,8 @@ tracesys_phase2:
>   */
>  GLOBAL(int_ret_from_sys_call)
>  	DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
> -	TRACE_IRQS_OFF
>  int_ret_from_sys_call_irqs_off:
> +	TRACE_IRQS_OFF
>  	movl $_TIF_ALLWORK_MASK,%edi
>  	/* edi:	mask to check */

This latter trick absolutely needs a comment, to keep future lockdep 
developers from wondering about the mismatch and the weird label 
placement ...

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/