Re: [PATCH V3 2/8] ARM: cpuidle: Add a cpuidle ops structure to be used for DT

[Stephen Boyd]

On 03/20, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The current state of the different cpuidle drivers is the different PM
> operations are passed via the platform_data using the platform driver
> paradigm.
> 
> This approach allowed to split the low level PM code from the arch specific
> and the generic cpuidle code.
> 
> Unfortunately there are complaints about this approach as, in the context of the
> single kernel image, we have multiple drivers loaded in memory for nothing and
> the platform driver is not adequate for cpuidle.
> 
> This patch provides a common interface via cpuidle ops for all new cpuidle
> driver and a definition for the device tree.
> 
> It will allow with the next patches to a have a common definition with ARM64
> and share the same cpuidle driver.
> 
> The code is optimized to use the __init section intensively in order to reduce
> the memory footprint after the driver is initialized and unify the function
> names with ARM64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for moving to OF tables. We can merge smp ops and cpuidle
ops later on.

Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/