Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] add support for pmic_arb v2 and correct framework

[Ivan T. Ivanov]

On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 11:37 -0600, Gilad Avidov wrote:
> pmic_arb v2 has no support for spmi non-data commands and thus
> returns -EOPNOTSUPP on .cmd callback. This causes a failure in
> spmi_drv_probe() which sends a wakeup command to the slave before
> probing its driver. This patchset removes the wakeup from
> spmi_drv_probe() since the spmi spec stipulates that a slaves
> default state is active and doesn't need a wakeup.
> 
> Changes from v3 to v4:
> * Remove the claim that this is a bug fix off the commit text
> * Unmap the core register space as soon as we know that it will not be used
> * Assign the core reg space to a local until we know if it appropriate to use
>    it to configure the controller fields (on v1) or unmap it (on v2).
> 
> Changes from v4 to v5:
> * remove the unmap added in v4 since it is used again and the mapping is managed.
> * correct printf formatting for 64bit compilers.
> * correct base address for reading the channel table.
> 
> Gilad Avidov (2):
>   spmi: remove wakeup command before slave probe
>   spmi: pmic_arb: add support for hw version 2

Thank you Gilad. This is fine now. Tested on APQ8084
(controller v1) and MSM8916 (controller v2).

I am wandering which is the appropriate tree to merge this?

Kumar?

Tested-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/