Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] add support for pmic_arb v2 and correct framework

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:26:09AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Mar 26, 2015, at 4:51 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 11:37 -0600, Gilad Avidov wrote:
> >> pmic_arb v2 has no support for spmi non-data commands and thus
> >> returns -EOPNOTSUPP on .cmd callback. This causes a failure in
> >> spmi_drv_probe() which sends a wakeup command to the slave before
> >> probing its driver. This patchset removes the wakeup from
> >> spmi_drv_probe() since the spmi spec stipulates that a slaves
> >> default state is active and doesn't need a wakeup.
> >> 
> >> Changes from v3 to v4:
> >> * Remove the claim that this is a bug fix off the commit text
> >> * Unmap the core register space as soon as we know that it will not be used
> >> * Assign the core reg space to a local until we know if it appropriate to use
> >>   it to configure the controller fields (on v1) or unmap it (on v2).
> >> 
> >> Changes from v4 to v5:
> >> * remove the unmap added in v4 since it is used again and the mapping is managed.
> >> * correct printf formatting for 64bit compilers.
> >> * correct base address for reading the channel table.
> >> 
> >> Gilad Avidov (2):
> >>  spmi: remove wakeup command before slave probe
> >>  spmi: pmic_arb: add support for hw version 2
> > 
> > Thank you Gilad. This is fine now. Tested on APQ8084
> > (controller v1) and MSM8916 (controller v2).
> > 
> > I am wandering which is the appropriate tree to merge this?
> > 
> > Kumar?
> 
> Weâve been asking Greg to pick up SPMI patches.

Yes, I can take them.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/