Re: [PATCH v4 14/15] ASoC: rockchip/rockchip-hdmi-audio: add sound driver for hdmi audio

[yakir]

Hi Mark,

On 2015å03æ27æ 02:16, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:04:30PM -0500, Yakir Yang wrote:
>
> > +	ret = snd_soc_dai_set_fmt(cpu_dai, dai_fmt);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		dev_err(cpu_dai->dev, "failed to set cpu_dai fmt.\n");
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> You've already set this in the dai_link, no need to do it again.

Okay, correct it in next v5.


> +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "hdmi audio init success.\n");
> Please remove noisy prints like this.

Okay, turn it to dev_debug(...)

> > +free_cpu_of_node:
> > +	hdmi_audio_dai.cpu_of_node = NULL;
> > +	hdmi_audio_dai.platform_of_node = NULL;
> > +free_priv_data:
> > +	snd_soc_card_set_drvdata(card, NULL);
> > +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> > +	card->dev = NULL;
> If any of these assignments is doing anything there's a problem with the
> code.
Yes, when probe failed, program will goto this code.
> > +{
> > +	struct snd_soc_card *card = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > +	snd_soc_unregister_card(card);
> devm_snd_soc_register_card() and you can remove this function entirely.
do you mean that when I take devm_snd_soc_register_card() to register card,
then I do not need unregister card any more(destroy with device) ?
> > +static const struct of_device_id rockchip_hdmi_audio_of_match[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-hdmi-audio", },
> > +	{},
> > +};
> There is no documentation for this binding, binding documentation is
> mandatory.  Based on the compatible string this looks like it's specific
> to the SoC rather than a design for a board - is the whole card part of
> the SoC?
It's my fault, cause the dts patch have not CC you, I will correct it in 
next v5

Thanks :)
Yakir

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/