Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: ENOMEM bugfixes

From: Omar Sandoval
Date: Fri Mar 27 2015 - 17:06:58 EST


On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:43:42PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:04:30PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:40:17PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > Ping. For anyone following along, it looks like commit cc87317726f8
> > > ("mm: page_alloc: revert inadvertent !__GFP_FS retry behavior change")
> > > reverted the commit that exposed these bugs. Josef said he was okay with
> > > taking these, will they make it to an upcoming -rc soon?
> >
> > Upcoming yes, but based on my experience with pushing patches that are
> > not really regressions in late rc's it's unlikely for 4.1.
>
> Ok, seeing as these bugs are going to be really hard to trigger now that
> the old GFP_FS behavior has been restored, I'm fine with waiting for the
> next merge window.
>
> Thank you!

Chris, would you mind taking these for a spin in your integration branch
for the next merge window?

Thanks,
--
Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/