Re: [PATCH 01/86] pci: export pci_ids.h

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 09:15:26AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:55:22AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:48:44AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 10:40:47PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 03:37:01PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > The macros in pci_ids.h are pretty useful for userspace
> > > > > using the pci sysfs interface.
> > > > > At the moment userspace is forced to duplicate these macros
> > > > > (e.g. QEMU does this), it is better to expose them in
> > > > > /usr/include/linux/pci_ids.h so everyone can just include
> > > > > this header.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  include/linux/pci_ids.h      | 2998 +-----------------------------------------
> > > > >  include/uapi/linux/pci_ids.h | 2997 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 
> > > > No, please use the pci ids file from the upstream pci id database
> > > > instead.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >  We shouldn't be putting these all in one file,
> > > 
> > > pci.txt says:
> > > 	Please add PCI_VENDOR_ID_xxx for vendors
> > > You want to change this policy, and get rid of
> > > vendor ids in pci_ids.h completely?
> > 
> > Please read the top of pci_ids.h.  It hasn't had new ids added to it in
> > a long time.
> 
> OK, looks like pci.txt should be fixed then.

Please send a patch.  As the original PCI kernel maintainer, I don't
think I ever noticed pci.txt.  It was last "updated" in 2006...

> > Why would userspace need the pci id of anything?
> 
> Look at how they are used e.g. by QEMU, seabios, gpxe.
> People want to say e.g. "find all network class devices".

Then use libpci.

> >  Again, just use
> > libpci, isn't it fast enough?  Don't duplicate existing logic.
> 
> This really depends on whether you want something else that
> libpci provides. But if I just want e.g. standard class IDs,
> I don't want to depend on libpci.

Why not?  Don't duplicate things that already are there just for this
very use.

Don't make us do kernel changes just because you don't want to depend on
either of the two different userspace packages that provide this
information in a standard way for userspace.  Your system will have one
of those two packages in it, depending on it isn't a "burden" at all.

> > Or use the hw database that libudev exports, which is already on your
> > machine and exports all of the pci ids from libpci directly.
> 
> Same argument really.

Because you don't want to depend on existing packages, doesn't mean we
have to accept kernel changes and maintain them for forever, as you are
now creating a new api that we will have to keep up to date and correct
for all time.

Again, depend on the packages that are already doing this work please.

> > > Standard class IDs are even sillier to duplicate.
> > 
> > Again, why does userspace need this?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Mostly because it has a userspace driver, or is emulating
> a hardware device.
> 
> For example, the VFIO driver uses the PCI hardware formats
> as it's userspace/kernel interface. This means I need
> a ton of PCI constants in userspace. Most of them are
> already in pci_regs.h, and so exported. No problem here.
> 
> However class and prog interface IDs are not, they
> are in pci_ids.h
> 
> Would you support splitting pci_ids.h to
> include/uapi/linux/pci_ids.h with standard headers
> and include/linux/pci_ids.h with device/vendor
> specific ones?

No, again, please use the "standard" Linux apis for these, don't
duplicate work and make people do more work over the long-term than is
needed.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/