[PATCH v4 14/15] target-s390x: Introduce facility test routine

From: Michael Mueller
Date: Mon Mar 30 2015 - 10:31:23 EST


The patch introduces routine s390_facility_test() which allows to
verify a specific facility bit is set.

Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
target-s390x/cpu-models.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
target-s390x/cpu-models.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu-models.c b/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
index aba44dd..a9f7372 100644
--- a/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
+++ b/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
@@ -736,3 +736,32 @@ bool s390_cpu_models_used(void)
{
return cpu_models_used;
}
+
+static inline int test_facility(uint64_t *fac_list, uint16_t nr)
+{
+ uint16_t word = nr / BITS_PER_LONG;
+ uint16_t be_bit = (BITS_PER_LONG - 1) - (nr % BITS_PER_LONG);
+
+ return (nr < FAC_LIST_CPU_S390_SIZE_UINT1) ?
+ (fac_list[word] >> be_bit) & __UINT64_C(1) : 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * s390_test_facility:
+ * @nr: facility bit number to test
+ * @cc: cpu class to test
+ *
+ * The functions tests if the cpu facility identified by bit @nr is available
+ * to the cpu class @cc.
+ *
+ * Returns: a boolean value.
+ *
+ * Since: 2.4
+ */
+bool s390_test_facility(S390CPUClass *cc, uint16_t nr)
+{
+ if (!cc) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ return test_facility(cc->fac_list[ACCEL_CURRENT], nr) ? true : false;
+}
diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
index 4734c58..eb0476f 100644
--- a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
+++ b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ uint64_t *s390_fac_list_mask_by_machine(const char *name);
uint64_t *s390_current_fac_list_mask(void);
void s390_cpu_model_init(S390CPUClass *cc);
bool s390_cpu_models_used(void);
+bool s390_test_facility(S390CPUClass *cc, uint16_t nr);

extern uint64_t qemu_s390_fac_list_mask[];

--
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/