Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] vfs: Non-blockling buffered fs read (page cache only)

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:32:27 -0700 Jeremy Allison <jra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 01:26:25PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > cons:
> > 
> > d) fincore() is more expensive
> > 
> > e) fincore() will very occasionally block
> 
> The above is the killer for Samba. If fincore
> returns true but when we schedule the pread
> we block, we're hosed.
> 
> Once we block, we're done serving clients on the main
> thread until this returns. That can cause unpredictable
> response times which can cause client timeouts.
> 
> A fincore+pread solution that blocks is simply unsafe
> to use for us. We'll have to stay with the threadpool :-(.

Finally.  Thanks ;)

This implies that the samba main thread also has to avoid any memory
allocations both direct and within syscall and pagefault - those will
occasionally exhibit similar worse-case latency. Is this done now?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/