[PATCH 2/2] timer: Replace base-> 'running_timer' with 'busy'
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Tue Mar 31 2015 - 02:55:47 EST
We don't need to track the running timer for a cpu base anymore, but sill need
to check business of base for sanity checking during CPU hotplug.
Lets replace 'running_timer' with 'busy' for handle that efficiently.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/time/timer.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 364644811485..2db05206594b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ struct tvec_root {
struct tvec_base {
spinlock_t lock;
- struct timer_list *running_timer;
+ bool busy;
unsigned long timer_jiffies;
unsigned long next_timer;
unsigned long active_timers;
@@ -1180,6 +1180,8 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct tvec_base *base)
spin_unlock_irq(&base->lock);
return;
}
+
+ base->busy = true;
while (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->timer_jiffies)) {
struct list_head work_list;
struct list_head *head = &work_list;
@@ -1236,7 +1238,6 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct tvec_base *base)
timer_stats_account_timer(timer);
- base->running_timer = timer;
timer_set_running(timer);
detach_expired_timer(timer, base);
@@ -1270,7 +1271,7 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct tvec_base *base)
}
}
}
- base->running_timer = NULL;
+ base->busy = false;
spin_unlock_irq(&base->lock);
}
@@ -1675,7 +1676,7 @@ static void migrate_timers(int cpu)
spin_lock_irq(&new_base->lock);
spin_lock_nested(&old_base->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
- BUG_ON(old_base->running_timer);
+ BUG_ON(old_base->busy);
for (i = 0; i < TVR_SIZE; i++)
migrate_timer_list(new_base, old_base->tv1.vec + i);
--
2.3.0.rc0.44.ga94655d
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/