Re: another pmem variant V2

[Ingo Molnar]

* Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 06:14:15PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > We can not accept it as is right now.
> 
> Who is we?
> 
> > We have conducted farther tests. And it messes up NUMA.
> 
> Only you if you use the memmap option in weird ways.
> 
> Sounds like I should simply remove the memmap= option so people don't
> abuse it.  The main point is to parse the e820 tables, which works fine.

I'd be fine with that too - mind sending an updated series?

the memmap= option can be added on top of that.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/