Re: Revised futex(2) man page for review

From: Davidlohr Bueso
Date: Tue Mar 31 2015 - 16:37:25 EST


On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 13:03 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > If the timeout argument is non-NULL, its contents specify a relâ
> > ative timeout for the wait, measured according to the
> > CLOCK_MONOTONIC clock. (This interval will be rounded up to the
> > system clock granularity, and kernel scheduling delays mean that
> > the blocking interval may overrun by a small amount.) If timeâ
> > out is NULL, the call blocks indefinitely.
>
> Would it not be better to only state that the wait will not return
> before the timeout -- unless woken -- and not bother with clock
> granularity and scheduling delays?

Yeah, similarly we also have this:

FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG (since Linux 2.6.22)
This option bit can be employed with all futex operations. It
tells the kernel that the futex is process-private and not
shared with another process (i.e., it is only being used for
synchronization between threads of the same process). This
allows the kernel to choose the fast path for validating the
user-space address and avoids expensive VMA lookups, taking refâ
erence counts on file backing store, and so on.

This to me reads a bit too much into the kernel (fastpath, refcnt,
vmas). Why not just mention that it avoids overhead in the kernel or
something? I don't recall any manpage mentioning such details, but I
could be wrong. In any case its a nit, the whole doc is pretty good and
I hope you can merge it soon and then just increment ;)

Thanks,
Davidlohr


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/