Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: replace kzalloc with copy_from_user with memdup_user

From: Drokin, Oleg
Date: Tue Mar 31 2015 - 18:45:20 EST



On Mar 31, 2015, at 11:57 AM, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:15:23PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Dhere, Chaitanya (C.) wrote:
>>
>>> This patch replaces kzalloc and copy_from_user with memdup_user call
>>> This change was detected with coccinelle tool
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Dhere <cvijaydh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c | 11 +++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c
>>> index 85e74d1..85b5567 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c
>>> @@ -2368,14 +2368,9 @@ ll_file_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>>> struct hsm_state_set *hss;
>>> int rc;
>>>
>>> - hss = kzalloc(sizeof(*hss), GFP_NOFS);
>>> - if (!hss)
>>> - return -ENOMEM;
>>> -
>>> - if (copy_from_user(hss, (char *)arg, sizeof(*hss))) {
>>> - OBD_FREE_PTR(hss);
>>> - return -EFAULT;
>>> - }
>>> + hss = memdup_user((char *)arg, sizeof(*hss));
>>
>> memdup_user will use the flag GFP_KERNEL, ie (__GFP_WAIT | __GFP_IO |
>> __GFP_FS), rather than the flag GFP_NOFS, ie (__GFP_WAIT | __GFP_IO), that
>> is specified. I don't know if this is a problem here.
>
> Yes, this is a filesystem, so this can't be changed, as we can't have
> the allocation go out and ask for more filesystem accesses in the middle
> of trying to do a filesystem access :)

Technically in this place we are not really holding any locks or anything else of value to cause a deadlock,
so we might be fine here.
More importantly, I totally missed this OBD_ALLOC replacement with kzalloc when it happened.
In theory all OBD_ALLOC() calls add up all allocated memory in a counter and then OBD_FREE() calls
subtract freed memory (for a poor man's memory leak detection and tracing).
Now since it's out of match, there should have been tons of very loud warnings about it, but I don't see
any in my logs and I wonder why.

Julia, I wonder if you happen to have a bunch of other patches to get rid of the rest of OBD_ALLOC and OBD_FREE stuff by any chance?

Bye,
Oleg--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/