Re: [PATCH] of: Custom printk format specifier for device node

From: Joe Perches
Date: Wed Apr 01 2015 - 01:07:41 EST

On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 21:52 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> Thinking about this more, I'd like to suggest a different format that
> gives us a nice hack on the name that makes it easy to remember:
> '%pOF[...]'
> 'O' still means 'object', but it is also overloaded for Open Firmware.
> That still leaves %pO? for other object types. What do you think?

I think that's fine.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at