Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: Support for IMG Pistachio

From: Ralf Baechle
Date: Wed Apr 01 2015 - 06:21:27 EST

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:29:55PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 12:29:55 +0100
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>, Ralf Baechle
> <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> <linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux MIPS <linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ezequiel
> Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@xxxxxxxxxx>, James Hartley
> <james.hartley@xxxxxxxxxx>, James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: Support for IMG Pistachio
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Andrew Bresticker
> <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'd like this to go through the MIPS tree with
> > Linus'/Alex's ACKs if possible.
> Why? It will only help creating merge conflicts.
> There seem to be no compile-related dependencies, just Kconfig
> symbols, so patches using this can go in orthogonally.

It would mean all the bits for Pistachio support go through a single tree
which simplifies testing and possibly fixing significantly. The
conflict potencial for this series is fairly low, I think.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at