Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf tools: introduce machine_map_new to merge mmap/mmap2 processing code.
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Wed Apr 01 2015 - 10:58:21 EST
Em Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 02:18:53PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 10:33:13AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
> > Create a machine_map_new() and merge mapping code in
> > machine__process_mmap2_event() and machine__process_mmap_event()
> > together. This patch is a preparation for following map adjustment
> > patches.
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> > +static int machine_map_new(struct machine *machine, u64 start, u64 len,
> > + u64 pgoff, u32 pid, u32 d_maj, u32 d_min, u64 ino,
> > + u64 ino_gen, u32 prot, u32 flags, char *filename,
> > + enum map_type type, struct thread *thread)
> the name style for this should be more like 'machine__new_map'
> I think Arnaldo will chime in.. ;-)
Right, I wonder if this is a function that is about 'maps' or 'machines'
mostly, that would say what prefix should be used, if map__ or
machine__, still need to review this patchset.
Just give a really quick lock, eyebrows raised, even more complexity for
the symbol layer, wonder if this can't be simplified...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/