On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 01:54 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
This makes use of the it_page_size from the iommu_table struct
as page size can differ.
This replaces missing IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT macro in commented debug code
as recently introduced IOMMU_PAGE_XXX macros do not include
IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
index f835e63..8bbee22 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int tce_iommu_enable(struct tce_container *container)
* enforcing the limit based on the max that the guest can map.
*/
down_write(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
- npages = (tbl->it_size << IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT_4K) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ npages = (tbl->it_size << tbl->it_page_shift) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
locked = current->mm->locked_vm + npages;
lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
if (locked > lock_limit && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static void tce_iommu_disable(struct tce_container *container)
down_write(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
current->mm->locked_vm -= (container->tbl->it_size <<
- IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT_4K) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ container->tbl->it_page_shift) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
up_write(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
}
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static long tce_iommu_build(struct tce_container *container,
tce, ret);
break;
}
- tce += IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE_4K;
+ tce += IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE(tbl);
Is PAGE_SIZE ever smaller than IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE(tbl)? IOW, can the page
we got from get_user_pages_fast() ever not completely fill the tce
entry?
(Have I asked this before? Sorry if so)