Re: mmotm 2015-04-01-14-54 uploaded

[Vladimir Murzin]

On 01/04/15 22:55, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> * mm-move-memtest-under-mm.patch
> * mm-move-memtest-under-mm-fix.patch

It was noticed by Paul Bolle (and his clever bot) that patch above
simply disables MEMTEST altogether [1]. Could you fold fix for that, please?

diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index ea369dd..cd6d74b 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1810,7 +1810,7 @@ config TEST_UDELAY

 config MEMTEST
 	bool "Memtest"
-	depends on MEMBLOCK
+	depends on HAVE_MEMBLOCK
 	---help---
 	  This option adds a kernel parameter 'memtest', which allows memtest
 	  to be set.
--

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/20/119

Thanks
Vladimir

> * memtest-use-phys_addr_t-for-physical-addresses.patch
> * arm64-add-support-for-memtest.patch
> * arm-add-support-for-memtest.patch
> * kconfig-memtest-update-number-of-test-patterns-up-to-17.patch
> * documentation-update-arch-list-in-the-memtest-entry.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/