Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] regulator: Introduce property to flag drms

From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Thu Apr 02 2015 - 17:35:33 EST

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 03:55:43PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> Introduce "regulator-allow-drms" to make it possible for board
>> configuration to enable drms for regulators.
> I don't think this is a good name, nobody unfamiliar with a fairly
> obscure feature in the Linux regulator API is going to know what DRMS
> means. Something like change-load might be clearer.

Right. And with the cleanup of the drms handling (drms_uA_update())
that we discussed during ELC it makes more sense for the Linux case as
well. I will rework this patch and include it when sending out the

Would you mind picking the other patches from this series or do you
want me to resend them? They are unrelated to this issue and will give
us working regulators (without set_load support) on the affected

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at