Re: [PATCH/RFC 5/6] staging: board: Add support for devices with complex dependencies
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Fri Apr 03 2015 - 09:27:48 EST
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> + error = clk_register_clkdev(clk, bsc->con_id, bsc->dev_id);
>> + if (error)
>> + pr_err("Failed to register clock %s (%d)\n", bsc->clk, error);
>> + return error;
> Missing curly braces. Also it's weird that don't we need a clk_put()
> on the error patch as well as the success path?
So it worked only by accident: with the new per-user struct clk instances
clk_put() must not be called if clk_register_clkdev() succeeded.
Will call clk_put() only if it failed.
>> + clk_put(clk);
>> + return 0;
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/