Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] vfs: Non-blockling buffered fs read (page cache only)
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Apr 03 2015 - 23:39:27 EST
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:26:25 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> d) fincore() is more expensive
Actually, I kinda take that back. fincore() will be faster than
preadv2() in the case of a pagecache miss, and slower in the case of a
pagecache hit.
The breakpoint appears to be a hit rate of 30% - if fewer than 30% of
queries find the page in pagecache, fincore() will be faster than
preadv2().
This is because for a pagecache miss, fincore() will be about twice as
fast as preadv2(). For a pagecache hit, fincore()+pread() is 55%
slower than preadv2(). If there are lots of misses, fincore() is
faster overall.
Minimal fincore() implementation is below. It doesn't implement the
page_map!=NULL mode at all and will be slow for large areas - it needs
to be taught about radix_tree_for_each_*(). But it's good enough for
testing.
On a slow machine, in nanoseconds:
null syscall: 528
fincore (miss): 674
fincore (hit): 729
single byte pread: 1026
single byte preadv: 1134
pread() is a bit faster than preadv() and samba uses pread(), so the
implementations are:
if (fincore(fd, NULL, offset, len) == len)
pread();
else
punt();
if (preadv2(fd, ..., offset, len) == len)
...
else
punt();
fincore+pread, pagecache-hit: 1755ns
fincore+pread, pagecache-miss: 674ns
preadv(): 1134ns (preadv2() will be a little faster for misses)
Now, a pagecache hit rate of 30% sounds high so one would think that
fincore+pread is clearly ahead. But the pagecache hit rate in this
code will actually be quite high, because of readahead.
For a large linear read of a file which is perfectly laid out on disk
and is fully *uncached*, the hit rates will be as good as 99.8%,
because readahead is bringing in data in 2MB blobs.
In practice I expect that fincore()+pread() will be slower for linear
reads of medium to large files and faster for small files and seeky
accesses.
How much does all this matter? Not much. On a fast machine a
single-byte pread() takes 240ns. So if your server thread is handling
25000 requests/sec, we're only talking 0.6% overhead.
Note that we can trivially monitor the hit rate with either preadv2()
or fincore()+pread(): just count how many times all the data is there
versus how many times it isn't.
Also, note that we can use *both* fincore() and preadv2() to detect the
problematic page-just-disappeared race:
if (fincore(fd, NULL, offset, len) == len) {
if (preadv2(fd, offset, len) != len)
printf("race just happened");
It would be great if someone could apply the below, modify the
preadv2() callsite as above and determine under what conditions (if
any) the page-stealing race occurs.
arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1
include/linux/syscalls.h | 2
mm/Makefile | 2
mm/fincore.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl~fincore arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
--- a/arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl~fincore
+++ a/arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
@@ -331,6 +331,7 @@
322 64 execveat stub_execveat
323 64 preadv2 sys_preadv2
324 64 pwritev2 sys_pwritev2
+325 common fincore sys_fincore
#
# x32-specific system call numbers start at 512 to avoid cache impact
diff -puN include/linux/syscalls.h~fincore include/linux/syscalls.h
--- a/include/linux/syscalls.h~fincore
+++ a/include/linux/syscalls.h
@@ -880,6 +880,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_process_vm_writev(pi
asmlinkage long sys_kcmp(pid_t pid1, pid_t pid2, int type,
unsigned long idx1, unsigned long idx2);
asmlinkage long sys_finit_module(int fd, const char __user *uargs, int flags);
+asmlinkage long sys_fincore(int fd, unsigned char __user *page_map,
+ loff_t offset, size_t len);
asmlinkage long sys_seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags,
const char __user *uargs);
asmlinkage long sys_getrandom(char __user *buf, size_t count,
diff -puN mm/Makefile~fincore mm/Makefile
--- a/mm/Makefile~fincore
+++ a/mm/Makefile
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ obj-y := filemap.o mempool.o oom_kill.
readahead.o swap.o truncate.o vmscan.o shmem.o \
util.o mmzone.o vmstat.o backing-dev.o \
mm_init.o mmu_context.o percpu.o slab_common.o \
- compaction.o vmacache.o \
+ compaction.o vmacache.o fincore.o \
interval_tree.o list_lru.o workingset.o \
debug.o $(mmu-y)
diff -puN /dev/null mm/fincore.c
--- /dev/null
+++ a/mm/fincore.c
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/pagemap.h>
+#include <linux/file.h>
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
+
+SYSCALL_DEFINE4(fincore, int, fd, unsigned char __user *, page_map,
+ loff_t, offset, size_t, len)
+{
+ struct fd f;
+ struct address_space *mapping;
+ loff_t cur_off;
+ loff_t end;
+ pgoff_t pgoff;
+ long ret = 0;
+
+ if (offset < 0 || (ssize_t)len <= 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ f = fdget(fd);
+
+ if (!f.file)
+ return -EBADF;
+
+ if (is_file_hugepages(f.file)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (!S_ISREG(file_inode(f.file)->i_mode)) {
+ ret = -EBADF;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ end = min_t(loff_t, offset + len, i_size_read(file_inode(f.file)));
+ pgoff = offset >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+ mapping = f.file->f_mapping;
+
+ /*
+ * We probably need to do somethnig here to reduce the chance of the
+ * pages being reclaimed between fincore() and read(). eg,
+ * SetPageReferenced(page) or mark_page_accessed(page) or
+ * activate_page(page).
+ */
+ for (cur_off = offset; cur_off < end ; ) {
+ struct page *page;
+ loff_t end_of_coverage;
+
+ page = find_get_page(mapping, pgoff);
+ if (!page || !PageUptodate(page))
+ break;
+ page_cache_release(page);
+
+ pgoff++;
+ end_of_coverage = min_t(loff_t, pgoff << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, end);
+ ret += end_of_coverage - cur_off;
+ cur_off = (cur_off + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) & PAGE_CACHE_MASK;
+ }
+
+out:
+ fdput(f);
+ return ret;
+}
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/