Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Introduce pci_bus_addr_t
From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Sat Apr 04 2015 - 08:47:22 EST
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> [+cc Sam (commented on previous versions), Russell, linux-arm-kernel, Ralf,
>> linux-mips, Ben, linuxppc-dev, x86]
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:32:34PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:57:47PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> > David Ahern found commit d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows
>>> > to fit in upstream windows") broke booting on sparc/T5-8.
>>> >
>>> > In the boot log, there is
>>> > pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 0x184: can't handle BAR above 4GB (bus address
>>> > 0x110204000)
>>> > but that only could happen when dma_addr_t is 32-bit.
>>> >
>>> > According to David Miller, all DMA occurs behind an IOMMU and these
>>> > IOMMUs only support 32-bit addressing, therefore dma_addr_t is
>>> > 32-bit on sparc64.
>>> >
>>> > Let's introduce pci_bus_addr_t instead of using dma_addr_t,
>>> > and pci_bus_addr_t will be 64-bit on 64-bit platform or X86_PAE.
>>> >
>>> > Fixes: commit d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows")
>>> > Fixes: commit 23b13bc76f35 ("PCI: Fail safely if we can't handle BARs larger than 4GB")
>>> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQU1gJY1LYrxs+ma5LCTEEe4xmtjRG0aXJ9K_Tsu+m9Wuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > Reported-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > Tested-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> #3.19
>>> > ---
>>> > drivers/pci/Kconfig | 4 ++++
>>> > drivers/pci/bus.c | 10 +++++-----
>>> > drivers/pci/probe.c | 12 ++++++------
>>> > include/linux/pci.h | 12 +++++++++---
>>> > 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>> >
>>> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>>> > index 7a8f1c5..6a5a269 100644
>>> > --- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>>> > +++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>>> > @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
>>> > #
>>> > # PCI configuration
>>> > #
>>> > +config PCI_BUS_ADDR_T_64BIT
>>> > + def_bool y if (64BIT || X86_PAE)
>>> > + depends on PCI
>>>
>>> We're going to use pci_bus_addr_t in some places where we previously used
>>> dma_addr_t, which means pci_bus_addr_t should be at least as large as
>>> dma_addr_t. Can you enforce that directly, e.g., with something like this?
>>>
>>> def_bool y if (ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT || 64BIT || X86_PAE)
>
> then should use
>
> def_bool y if (ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT || 64BIT)
OK, would you mind updating this series, incorporating the doc
updates, and reposting it?
I think there's still an unresolved question about the OF parsing code.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/