Re: [PATCH 2/2] nohz: make nohz_full imply isolcpus
From: Chris Metcalf
Date: Sat Apr 04 2015 - 13:09:52 EST
On 4/4/2015 10:10 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
Rik, what's the change you're proposing that's similar to this one? Thanks!
I don't have this particular one, and I like it.
I know there are use cases where isolcpus= without
nohz_full= makes sense, but I cannot think of the
Acked-by: Rik van Riel<riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, I'll push it via the tile tree unless someone would prefer otherwise.
(The tick_nohz_full_set_cpus() and tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus() routines are in
earlier tile tree commits, the latter supporting a change to the tile network driver.)
Mike, I added your
Thumbs-Up-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@xxxxxxxxx> :-)
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/