Re: [PATCH/RFC 5/6] staging: board: Add support for devices with complex dependencies
From: Laurent Pinchart
Date: Sun Apr 05 2015 - 16:06:09 EST
On Sunday 05 April 2015 11:00:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> + for (i = 0; i < dev->ngpios; i++)
> >> + gpio_request_one(dev->gpios[i].gpio, dev->gpios[i].flags,
> >> + pdev->name);
> > Aren't GPIO numbers dynamic too in DT-based systems ? Beside, shouldn't it
> > be
> Apparently not, as the old legacy number still works, and it doesn't work
I think we're just lucky there that the SoC main GPIO controller gets
registered first and starts counting GPIOs with a zero offset.
> > the responsibility of the drievr to request the GPIOs it needs ?
> As far as I understand it, on Armadillo this is used more for platform
> configuration than for device configuration, as it affects multiple devices
> (the comment says DBGMD/LCDC0/FSIA MUX).
> I guess I could use a "gpio-hog" subnode in DT instead, but then we're
> already implementing the conversion to DT ;-)
But that's the goal :-) I'd rather move GPIO and pinctrl to DT directly as we
already have the infrastructure to do so.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/