Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Introduce pci_bus_addr_t

From: Rob Herring
Date: Mon Apr 06 2015 - 09:06:02 EST

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I think there's still an unresolved question about the OF parsing code.
>> Got a pointer to what that is? I'll take a guess. Generally, we make
>> the parsing code independent of the kernel addr sizes and use u64
>> types. The DT sizes and kernel sizes are not always aligned. For
>> example, an LPAE capable platform running a non-LPAE kernel build.
> Yep:
> Yinghai made a change to the sparc OF parsing code. The question is
> whether a similar change should be made to clones of that code (two
> others in arch/sparc, one in arch/powerpc, and one in drivers/of).

Yes, it appears to me that is needed. At least the drivers/of/ code
does not distinguish 32 and 64 bit ATM.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at