Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH 1/2] x86: add support for the non-standard protected e820 type

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Mon Apr 06 2015 - 14:26:42 EST

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 11:40 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> OK, I will send a patch for the fix, with suggested update from
> Christoph of not to re-add 'type' argument to e820_end_pfn().
> Yinghai, I will add your sign-off to the patch. Let me know if you have
> any concern.

I think we should restore all to original.

e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, unsigned type)

otherwise it will cause confusing, because last two really have ram_pfn,
and the first one does not has ram in the function name.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at