Re: [PATCH 3/4] spi: bcm-mspi: Make BCMA optional to support non-BCMA chips

From: Jonathan Richardson
Date: Mon Apr 06 2015 - 14:46:01 EST

On 15-04-03 10:52 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 03/04/15 06:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Jonathan Richardson
>> <jonathar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The Broadcom MSPI controller is used on various chips. The driver only
>>> supported BCM53xx chips with BCMA (an AMBA bus variant). The driver is
>>> refactored to make BCMA optional and provides a new config for non BCMA
>>> systems.
>>> struct bcm_mspi {
>>> struct bcma_device *core;
>>> - struct spi_master *master;
>>> + #endif
>>> + void __iomem *base;
>>> + struct spi_master *master;
>>> size_t read_offset;
>>> + void (*mspi_write)(struct bcm_mspi *mspi, u16 offset, u32 value);
>>> + u32 (*mspi_read)(struct bcm_mspi *mspi, u16 offset);
>>> +};
>> To avoid ugly ifdefs I think better to split driver to core part and
>> the actual driver part, at the end you will have something like
>> mspi-core.c mspi-53xx.c mspi-whatever.c. Check for example spi-dw*.c
> Actually, I am really curious whether we need the special BCMA I/O
> accessors in the first place, cannot we just access the MSPI core on
> BCM53xx chips using regular MMIO? That would probably solve the
> "problem" entirely. Rafal, did you try this before?
> As for splitting the driver into a "library" driver which is mostly
> independent from the bus and a bus-specific wrapper, I think BCMA is
> really the only special case here, which is why I suggested earlier to
> Jonathan that we might just prefer ifdefing things out instead of
> creating a separate layer just for BCMA.

I cringed adding the ifdefs to the driver but didn't think the small
amount of code that wouldn't be used again warranted 3 files. I could
also handle the two different probe routines by doing some DT parsing in
init, but then BCMA would have to be compiled for the non-BCMA MSPI
driver and I didn't want to do that either.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at