Re: [PATCH v4] x86, selftests: Add sigreturn selftest

From: Michael Ellerman
Date: Tue Apr 07 2015 - 23:42:27 EST


On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 23:11 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 19:01 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> This is my sigreturn test, added mostly unchanged from its old home.
> >> It exercises the sigreturn(2) syscall, specifically focusing on its
> >> interactions with various IRET corner cases. It tests for correct
> >> behavior in several areas that were historically dangerously buggy.
> >> For example, it exercises espfix on kernels of both bitnesses under
> >> various conditions, and it contains exploits for several now-fixed
> >> bugs in IRET error handling.
> >>
> >> If you run it on older kernels, your system will crash. It probably
> >> won't eat your data in the process.
> >>
> >> There is no released kernel on which the sigreturn_64 test will
> >> pass, but it passes on tip:x86/asm.
> >>
> >> IMO it's unfortunate that I need to provide a special script to run
> >> tests. I'd rather just list my targets.
> >
> > If you use lib.mk you can.
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/log/?h=next
> >
> > See for example:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=next&id=5744de542dd4b963c2975e6f70844ce2899864e4
>
> Will do for 4.2. In the mean time, there's no base on which lib.mk
> exists and the test works.

OK.

Shua seems to have already sent a pull request for 4.1, which is rather early
to say the least, but suggests you've missed 4.1 anyway - unless you want it to
go via some other tree.

cheers


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/